Pages Menu
TwitterRss
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jul 2, 2012 in Business, Leadership | 6 comments

The Net Effect of Your Leadership

In the U.S. this week we celebrate our country’s independence. So, we are taking the week off. But we’re still sharing the Switch and Shift message. All this week we’ll share our favorite posts we’ve written for others or from our previous solo blogs.

I recall reading recently a point made by a journalist that organizations are over-led and under-managed. The point connected of course to the countless problems companies face as a result of the global financial crises. What annoyed me about the comment was the flawed assumption that the two must be at odds with each other.

Such logic led me to wonder how many managers and employees might be thinking the same thing: to navigate through this mess, we just need to gnash our teeth and get things done; there is no time to reassess, regroup and rally the overworked and exhausted; they ought to know where they are needed, what needs to be sold.

But let us stop dear reader. Breathe. Count to ten.

Before you gnash your teeth or inspire and rally, think about how you want to leave your employees as an effect of your leadership and your management. Because clearly we are not playing an “Or” game, but an “And” game. We need your leadership and your management. The two slosh about together fluidly.

Where we need your head is focusing on how you are going to get your team or your company to move the ball closer to your next goal. Carrots and sticks are not enough. You must uncover what is in it for your employees. And then lead and manage the heck out of the play.

And you say, dear writer, Duh!

The nuance in this is not the action, but how your employees are after you lead and manage. Let ‘s turn to Robert Greenleaf for some context.

Robert Greenleaf said this about leaders who serve their people:

[It] is terribly important that one know, both about himself and about others, whether the net effect of one’s influence on others enriches, is neutral, or diminishes and depletes.

Whether you need to plan, schedule, monitor, inspire, coach, or motivate your team, think about how your management and leadership style leaves people. If you need the team to move the ball closer to the goal and regroup quickly, then stop gnashing your teeth. If you need to get a quick win gnash your teeth and tell people why you’re gnashing.

Clearly I’m exaggerating and stereotyping management and leadership. The point is that you must be clear that what you want to do and what is needed may be at odds.

You must know when to manage and when to lead. Chose your approach by thinking how you want to leave your people afterwards. You cannot afford more carnage in the form of disgruntled, unhappy employees leaving your team or organization. It will not be easy to find a replacement.

In the 21st century, businesses bump and glide in a chaordic soup that need managers who are focused on serving people and self-aware enough to know what is needed for both employee and organizational success.

This post appeared originally on Stephan De Villiers Leadership Connexion.

Shawn Murphy (104 Posts)

Change Leader | Speaker | Writer Owner and principal consultant at Achieved Strategies. Co-founder of Switch and Shift. Passionately explores the space where business & humanity intersect. Promoter of workplace optimism. Believes work can be a source of joy. Top ranked on Huffington Post and HR Examiner.


468 ad
  • http://gravatar.com/steveborek Steve Borek

    The leader is always being watched. Everything you say and do. Everything you don’t say and do. All of it has an effect on your team.

    • http://www.switchandshift.com Shawn Murphy

      Steve,
      To some perhaps daunting, the watchful followers and peers can be received as an exercise in humility and an open invitation to allow others to get to know you as a leader. Certainly there is some level of concern about how watchful people are of leaders, but to let the concern adversely color actions and beliefs would be an unfortunate misstep adversely effecting one’s leadership.

      Great to have your voice here, Steve.

      Shawn

  • http://leadagers.com/ C LeBlanc

    Shawn,

    As you can imagine I really liked – “Because clearly we are not playing an “Or” game, but an “And” game. We need your leadership and your management. The two slosh about together fluidly.” There are working moments, when everyone with hands, comes upon the realization that ambidextrousness would be of great value. – So it goes with leadership and management in business – two different parts of the body – but when “fluidly” working together and with equal skill and adroitness – they are still different, but more effective, efficient and powerful .

    • http://www.switchandshift.com Shawn Murphy

      Well said, Chase. The age old argument over which is better ultimately leads to the same place – assumptions that one is better than the other. Clearly the assumption of choosing one over the other hasn’t helped us in the 21st century, and the part of the 20th century. We are in evolving times. And I’m hopeful most will move beyond the question if one or the other.

      Be well.

  • http://www.liveitforward.com/ Kent Julian

    Understanding our behavioral style as leaders is key to improving our leadership abilities, as well as getting the results we want from our teams. Excellent post!

    • http://www.switchandshift.com Shawn Murphy

      Hi Kent,
      Thank you, Kent, for taking time to read and commenting. Imagine what great things could happen when more managers take the time to know how their leadership abilities can make the work environment one that unites and brings out employees’ talents. I’m eager to see that happen more frequently.

      Cheers.