What’s Wrong with Being Passive Aggressive?
A client asked me this question recently when I discussed with them how perhaps they needed to be more consistently assertive in their interactions in the workplace. There was obvious confusion about what the term passive-aggressive meant when we had a good dialogue about that. In this article I’d like to clarify the distinctions between assertiveness, aggressiveness and being passive. I do not believe one can ever be too assertive but you have to be clear on the distinctions.
My client was actually considering the concept of passive-aggressiveness in light of their reflection on a particularly contentious discussion within their team about various paths to pursue regarding some rather pivotal challenges. They regretted being less aggressive about their thoughts and perspectives during the dialogue about various options for dealing with these challenges. They also recognized the need to be passive when their boss got on his soapbox about what he wanted to do. The problem is there was a lot of confusion about the differences among these three different positions and I used this chart to demonstrate them:
The “I’M OK, You’re OK” model came from a book with the same title by Thomas A. Harris, M.D. that came out in 1969 and sold over 15 million copies. Let me explain each point on this triangle.
This indicates that the individual believes that I’m OK and You’re OK, that I have my wants, my needs, and my desires and that I’m going to do everything in my power to fulfill them. It also recognizes that you have your own unique needs and desires and that you have the right to equally pursue them. It recognizes that to get along there is usually a need for dialogue and often compromise. It also recognizes that there are some things that are nonnegotiable, needs that you will not give up. But by recognizing the worth of the perspectives and needs of others, it sets a much more effective tone for balanced negotiation and dialogue.
By recognizing the worth of the perspectives and needs of others, it sets a much more effective tone for balanced negotiation and dialogue.
This indicates that I am OK and You’re Not OK, that I am going to pursue my needs and desires regardless of any impact on you or your needs. Aggressiveness has its place on battlefields, athletic fields and it currently seems to be the primary model in the field of politics. It does not build healthy and effective long term relationships when one side consistently seeks to press their will on others.
I realize it sounds odd for many people to hear one say that I’m Not OK and You are. There are a host of reasons that someone may choose this path and many of them are psychological in nature. Working with a passive manager is often one of the most frustrating positions for an individual.
In her book, [easyazon_link asin=”081445769X” locale=”US” new_window=”default” nofollow=”default” tag=”achievstrate-20″ add_to_cart=”default” cloaking=”default” localization=”default” popups=”default”]Mastering Assertiveness Skills[/easyazon_link], Elaina Zuker suggested the following to help us understand the basics of being assertive.
Assertive Bill of Rights
- I have the right to be treated with respect.
- I have the right to have and express my own feelings and opinions.
- I have the right to be listened to and taken seriously.
- I have the right to set my own priorities.
- I have the right to say no without feeling guilty.
- I have the right to ask for what I want.
- I have the right to get what I pay for.
- I have the right to make mistakes.
- I have the right to assert myself even though I may inconvenience others.
- I have the right to choose not to assert myself.
These “rights” may seem self evident, to borrow from a famous document, but they require confidence and conviction to live by. That’s why I mentioned that I do not feel someone can be too assertive, especially when you consider the last right – to choose NOT to assert yourself when you wish.
Now let’s return to the issue of being passive aggressive. Referring to the diagram you’ll see that I have lines that lead from both being aggressive and being passive towards being assertive. That is a direction or goal that I think is important for people to consider from either of those starting points. You’ll also notice that there is a dotted arrow that connects aggressiveness with passiveness. If someone is counseled about being too aggressive, they often retreat to doing very little and being passive. However this is not their natural state and the aggressiveness will leak out. If someone is encouraged to be more assertive, when they have traditionally been passive, they often overdo it and can seem aggressive. And thus people will flip-flop between the passive and aggressive modes of behavior. This passive aggressive behavior is often demonstrated by snide or denigrating comments, subtle accusations, mean-spirited or cutting humor, and a fairly active rumor mill. It all seems fairly indirect, but it is usually profoundly negative.
If someone is encouraged to be more assertive, when they have traditionally been passive, they often overdo it and can seem aggressive.
In summary, choosing the assertive path is rarely easy and may not always be popular, but it will be respected. Ask yourself:
- What’s my primary mode of behavior among these three styles?
- What have I done either too aggressively or passively and why did I choose each paths at that time?
- When have I effectively asserted myself and how can I seek to make that my normal mode of behavior?
- What’s the one thing I can do to enhance my assertiveness TODAY?
I look forward to your thoughts. Make sure you leave a comment to share what you learned and how you’re going to use it at the end of this post.
Did you like today’s post? If so you’ll love our frequent newsletter! Sign up HERE and receive The Switch and Shift Change Playbook, by Shawn Murphy, as our thanks to you!
Copyright: hasenonkel / 123RF Stock Photo