Pages Menu
TwitterRss
Categories Menu

Posted by on Oct 22, 2012 in Engagement, Leadership, Special Series, Winning Through Engagement | 7 comments

Why Engagement Sucks, And The Two Things We Need To Fix It – Part 2

Welcome to the second full week of our special blog series, “Winning through Engagement.” We start the week with the conclusion to Josh Allan Dykstra’s post on making work environments that don’t suck! Suck work environments deplete engagement.

Right now our employee engagement sucks. Depending on who’s measuring it, somewhere between 70% and 80% of our people aren’t emotionally connecting to their work in a meaningful way, and we don’t seem to be able to move the needle in any significant way.

As mentioned in my last post, there are two invisible reasons why we haven’t been able to improve engagement statistics.

The first reason is that our own beliefs have thrown us off track. In the most terrible kind of self-fulfilling prophecy, we’ve decided to believe that work is supposed to suck—and because of this, it continues to do just that.

If we truly desire more life-giving places to work, the first thing we must do is believe they can be.

But that isn’t enough. We’ve got one more significant invisible challenge to contend with.

2) OUR SYSTEMS SUCK

In our organizations we have all sorts of systems that deal with people. These are the rules and policies we put in place to govern the way employees behave with each other, and they include things like our performance reviews, vacation policies, compensation regulations, and dress codes (among other more subtle “company culture” things). Most of these systems are holdovers from when work was more linear and predictable. They used to work just fine, but they are now outdated; they are liabilities in a fluid and dynamic world.

Sadly, most of our current human systems are life-sucking. (Example: how energized were you by your last performance review?)

We’ve decided to believe that work is supposed to suck—and because of this, it continues to do just that.

This is true for our engagement interventions, too. Most engagement “remedies” make things more complicated, overwhelming us with huge amounts of data and information—which is precisely what we don’t need more of (reference the last post: more “proof” has NOT helped us). We don’t have time for 100-question surveys or for more complicated theories.

We need simple, straightforward actions.

We need new behaviors.

Most importantly, we need new life-giving systems.

This is difficult, because while policies and procedures might be written down and shoved in an HR person’s filing cabinet, that’s not where they actually live. In reality, these things live in our organization’s culture, in the everyday interactions and in the behaviors we choose. They are invisible, too, and this “invisible-ness” is what makes them so hard to change.

We need better social agreements in our organizations, ones that focus on what’s right with people instead of what’s wrong with them. We need simple, focused ways to measure and track engagement. We need better strategies for meetings (many times we just need A strategy for meetings). We need organizational structures that work with people’s passions, instead of against them.

Until we 1) Find a way to change what we believe about our relationship with work at a fundamental level, and 2) Provide people new systems to use within organizations, engagement levels will stay right where they are.

We are not resigned to this fate. But we’ll never get there with the surface changes we’ve been trying; we must address these deep, invisible challenges instead. It may be more difficult, but it’s the only thing that will make our work work again.

 

Josh Allan Dykstra is a consultant/author/speaker and co-founder of Strengths Doctors, a consulting firm which helps leaders and entrepreneurs design energizing company culture. His eclectic background spans Fortune 500 companies like Apple, Starbucks, Genentech, Sony, and Viacom/CBS to startups, nonprofits, universities, and government agencies. He holds an MBA in Executive Leadership from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and his new book about the changing world of work, Igniting the Invisible Tribe: Designing An Organization That Doesn’t Suck, is available now. Connect with him online at http://joshallan.com.

 

Photo courtesy of  Andrew Vasil’ev

Josh Allan Dykstra (3 Posts)

Josh Allan Dykstra is a recognized thought leader on the future of work and company culture design. His articles and ideas have been featured by Fast Company, Business Insider, MSN.com, Under30CEO, and The Agency Post. He is a co-founder of Strengths Doctors, a consulting firm that helps leaders and entrepreneurs design energizing places to work. Josh's eclectic background includes projects with organizations like Apple, Sony, Genentech, HTC, Starbucks, and Viacom/CBS as well as startups, nonprofits, and universities. He holds an MBA in Executive Leadership from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and his new book, Igniting the Invisible Tribe: Designing An Organization That Doesn’t Suck, is available on Amazon.com.


468 ad
  • Pingback: Why Engagement Sucks and Two Things We Need To Fix It – Part 1 | Switch and Shift

  • http://www.b2bkingdom.com Andrea Naomi

    Great post Josh. The idea of creating social agreements that focus on “what’s right with people” is an excellent point. I think many organizations realize they need to make a dramatic transition from former social organizational structures – your post will prove to be a great resource! Thanks for sharing :)

    • http://joshallan.com Josh Allan Dykstra

      Thanks, Andrea. That one shift right there — from “what’s wrong with people” to “what’s right with people” — is a pretty big transition, and it is SO important. Most leaders I work with don’t even realize how many of their org systems are bent towards fixing people’s deficiencies, or that a relentless “weakness focus” is one of the primary drainers of engagement.

      If I can help at all in your work, just let me know!

  • http://maritzmotivationsolutionsblog.com @michpoko

    I believe that some of our better, more social employee recognition solutions help to create real time, real life, more social performance feedback – putting the power of reward and recognition into the hands of employees (not just managers) while maintaining a framework around the company’s goals and values. I believe this begins to answer the need for newer ‘systems’ or containers that help foster engagement. We need to get better integration into and leverage by performance evaluation processes to make the most of this insight (who is doing great and valued work inside the organization).

  • http://Brproservices.com William Curry

    Well Josh

    The no none left behind has killed the work place. The reality is work is done in the work place. Few can work from the beach.

    To mention a handful of companies doing it the fun and productive way are in the minority and will eventually slide to the norm

    Work is for pay so one can then pay to play

    • http://maritzmotivationsolutionsblog.com @michpoko

      I guess I have a different perspetive. What is the norm in work environments and what generates value for organizations evolves continuously. We are no longer in the Industrial age. More and more value comes from knowledge, creativity, innovation and delivering experience – these differentiate organizations and brands. I believe the companies, both large and small, that will thrive in the current economy are those with a clear purpose that is experienced from the inside out. Yes, work is a contract. Something is expected in return for the paycheck. But fun isn’t the opposite of work. And work (read output and business results) is made better when I am having more fun. Reference the spotlight series from HBR from Jan-February issue earlier this year, called the Happiness Factor: http://hbr.org/archive-toc/BR1201

    • http://joshallan.com Josh Allan Dykstra

      Thanks for the thoughts, William. I certainly hear where you’re coming from. The challenge, I think, is that “work” and “life” no longer live in separate buckets. Of course, it’s been going in this direction for a long time, but with all our technologies we are more constantly connected than ever before — and this isn’t going to stop. In fact, it’s going to accelerate. This means that it will be essential for leaders and organizations to learn how to generate a healthy work/life integration (not balance).

  • http://www.connect2action.com Duane Grove

    Environment is the key. Unfortunately, too many organizations hopping on the engagement bandwagon believe if they simply put the right “program” in place, then they will get the benefits. However, engagement starts with empathy and awareness, not with a new process or program. Organizations that drive the environment to do as you point out “focus on what is right” can consistently experience higher levels of engagement and you don’t need special programs or surveys to figure that out, just plain ‘ol common sense and authentic engagement at the individual level. Great posts!